From nobody Fri Dec 27 02:19:05 2024 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142E117586 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Hym5l0V0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705330578; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G9IyLlNQvTDl0/1tAqXyWhNRvbg24OTYwtFLu9ZpWr8=; b=Hym5l0V0hzsjl+G/zmkPraLVI6+vWdg7/fbUYk3+RWmjnJYYd+xQahHE2gI9920d5h83w8 nkCaQUtKfVV7u3n5mIijcimLW12FMNgcuSGJGteO8/YB3+pgzCWSE66v1ZlCDKa9spFVai r86J+AL+1MeF7xM5k3jk4PAoUJekKdQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-664-lcC9BWVJN1iK3lztLpF1xg-1; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:56:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lcC9BWVJN1iK3lztLpF1xg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3681C04B61 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerbillo.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.225.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBDD1C05E1A for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:56:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Abeni To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH mptcp-net] mptcp: relax check on MPC passive fallback Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4d9707b72d37cec9b4b6725bfcf3ae03010e0d51.1705330501.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; x-default="true" While testing the blamed commit below, I was able to miss noticing(!) packetdrill failures in the fastopen test-cases. On passive fastopen the child socket is created by incoming TCP MPC syn, allow for both MPC_SYN and MPC_ACK header. While at it, additionally allow for real OoO packets, as the RFC mandates. Fixes: 724b00c12957 ("mptcp: refine opt_mp_capable determination") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 1117d1e84274..90984b053adc 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -783,7 +783,8 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct = sock *sk, * options. */ mptcp_get_options(skb, &mp_opt); - if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_ACK)) + if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & + (OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_SYN | OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_ACK | OPTION_MPTCP_DSS))) fallback =3D true; =20 } else if (subflow_req->mp_join) { --=20 2.43.0