This patch fixes the spelling mistakes in comments.
The changes were generated using codespell and reviewed manually.
eariler -> earlier
greceful -> graceful
Signed-off-by: Shi-Sheng Yang <fourcolor4c@gmail.com>
---
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 97ec44d1df30..0ac8d4850751 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
}
/* check for expected invariant - should never trigger, just help
- * catching eariler subtle bugs
+ * catching earlier subtle bugs
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(child && *own_req && tcp_sk(child)->is_mptcp &&
(!mptcp_subflow_ctx(child) ||
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ static void mptcp_subflow_fail(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
unsigned long fail_tout;
- /* greceful failure can happen only on the MPC subflow */
+ /* graceful failure can happen only on the MPC subflow */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ssk != READ_ONCE(msk->first)))
return;
--
2.34.1
Hi Shi-Sheng, On 02/05/2024 17:47, Shi-Sheng Yang wrote: > This patch fixes the spelling mistakes in comments. > The changes were generated using codespell and reviewed manually. > > eariler -> earlier > greceful -> graceful Thank you for the fix, it looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> @Simon: many thanks for the previous review! @Netdev maintainers: I think it is best to apply this patch -- and similar ones -- directly in the Netdev tree, no need to have it first in the MPTCP tree. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:47:40PM +0800, Shi-Sheng Yang wrote: > This patch fixes the spelling mistakes in comments. > The changes were generated using codespell and reviewed manually. > > eariler -> earlier > greceful -> graceful > > Signed-off-by: Shi-Sheng Yang <fourcolor4c@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Hi Shi-Sheng, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅ - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/8926914986 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/a9a443be8da7 Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=849948 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.