From nobody Tue Feb 10 20:51:46 2026 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04CFD1C33 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f25-20020a1c6a19000000b003da221fbf48so965870wmc.1 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tessares.net; s=google; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1z1B/1JOxMW/1pI2Wr97ucv1iX3/JwBnig2uQUdIcTc=; b=5AlvuidXbJf9QcpdTpFTQ3XIvsxA6QM3J2QVvXeO2oPBk4JwRg48JkQA1aGwinnijW bnjnVjpYS1LMR/uISaOqqytr6izXowhbrkqZCQCXp7Td41nS1jyuIbavzAid3YdzBYYn R/ISuQg+LWzuTxdOvc1NLagXN2peIqRwXRV6Zufh8OcEuKVJK29wwgT9LloXkATkbl5f qpQ6DmcADoRfvt2XlUU3atKvuwhCViq6xzWpFL4opA9jsrUAAfh/v+5K9k2BUCqv5nOg +lJEeg7H4wBxy7dRbUpmtn89dE/98UQNZ53DvF58Df2Wq3MSc1is9iyfvg3+EvYu32fM Xg9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1z1B/1JOxMW/1pI2Wr97ucv1iX3/JwBnig2uQUdIcTc=; b=Lled7lCDGQ3NCHzwoQbbEA2VBVwI+6+/iGQWnz9IuaQeMkUrEm8tbmpvg8E8C9/fkC gKYztP7otY+q/zSHQXnl5PQQ6BiRU0Mit4t+U/x7NE2eyisBR0rDesaQ78Jf9eaSm6hg GFn8NCFyuy8uC1Uq/1t+EPi/boLUDQse7wtzuisj05y8ikkyI41oI9kl8Fx3nBQ5ffRY Ed3imiw4kFWboFBseEZmNwSh6UoLE4wD4KBzFX0zhVV4vJ46znVGM5aLvpyQE1wabYjD AcOliGzZcvqckpCdU1tfP5DZr0HFsrWlJW9KFYJUqdwRGbEAzLmkVCo1rRIZQOvxepTp X6GQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqjSabmjJKhOpb1oef1vodSeO1GsPmWNVD/6C5faZoS/XII/kBv mVfPFLnX4Ee1ddFHfLITVGuQkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuqjbPK/+LEXjfmBwGtWXg1dSi14zWHaxjHnmbQSe6swgeyMJidojtv4zBnigQIFxETLsw7jw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d16:b0:3d0:6a57:66a5 with SMTP id bh22-20020a05600c3d1600b003d06a5766a5mr31466298wmb.0.1674643680203; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from vdi08.nix.tessares.net (static.219.156.76.144.clients.your-server.de. [144.76.156.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r1-20020a05600c424100b003d9a86a13bfsm1423692wmm.28.2023.01.25.02.47.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:47:59 -0800 (PST) From: Matthieu Baerts Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:47:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/8] mptcp: let the in-kernel PM use mixed IPv4 and IPv6 addresses Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20230123-upstream-net-next-pm-v4-v6-v1-1-43fac502bfbf@tessares.net> References: <20230123-upstream-net-next-pm-v4-v6-v1-0-43fac502bfbf@tessares.net> In-Reply-To: <20230123-upstream-net-next-pm-v4-v6-v1-0-43fac502bfbf@tessares.net> To: Mat Martineau , Matthieu Baerts , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: b4 0.12.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=6003; i=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=phB3Quqjf5qDr2/ijmhFJn3RK2f2//PZBhh2fNKOcGY=; b=owEBbQKS/ZANAwAIAfa3gk9CaaBzAcsmYgBj0QjdhQO4IK1wDoBVMgenu8k8FVw5u/Xdg9QAlMfS i7JjdoiJAjMEAAEIAB0WIQToy4X3aHcFem4n93r2t4JPQmmgcwUCY9EI3QAKCRD2t4JPQmmgc9iJD/ 99TD5UCm4XypLquMD/xCMex5l7ycoRiuRYtSMXW/9P5dhgVPcmvcqiJENb4EyOqIYvargib+B7Q5r4 eClS38P7Q4w3JA6K+pT6ofjUX9fN0CU4B3R4ql4LRKrA9Bj0fOFNsHJal+Z+7FefXQjbYfUqwMnCHe tdLJ8ji6y0FLQBwjTesMEPxLDH+mwWAPtQvLes+bTaGjpUALKOpQLEs4aCrMKBH2fGY1MtOXrdWqWz L5ESpeMTAKEOcZUGWrgEfj/HBbCJXEtwp878jXzs6oG91hQhkAEK6DhQeUcsh4R7UHYM03zXT26jwq wSaxUd6VPKT7HLjTmShqy+gFkLU+CcRjbAB69QvrqgQuO3BpJIzZMyiR5Vrm8MnWr4alh2o+8EEEwY AOGY3OVN0lBUKciSC3ve2XjjsbREHJJUA30YNOhXF8sd0dQhvLUmzqoj1HN309hm/SI1VRVXDv4ZTY QH4guWqs6VuSsizRQCtYTKlNzhEhpssa1fnBGIo8Kxd1f+6pDTwGObhkjDE7Euhs9GGuDTErtptLAu JZXwnss96Wrprd3nrYn8/GDfoDZutI0Hruyt1J5Qv6yGaktw9Xqjeb9QVoZj/voR45RFcGs3ghO+QH RoyBIZpi/hnLYM4bsi0OgrciAzJ296raz7A9WsO+t1MnDJUhkiO1mqWlgxMQ== X-Developer-Key: i=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net; a=openpgp; fpr=E8CB85F76877057A6E27F77AF6B7824F4269A073 From: Paolo Abeni Currently the in-kernel PM arbitrary enforces that created subflow's family must match the main MPTCP socket while the RFC allows mixing IPv4 and IPv6 subflows. This patch changes the in-kernel PM logic to create subflows matching the currently selected source (or destination) address. IPv4 sockets can pick only IPv4 addresses (and v4 mapped in v6), while IPv6 sockets not restricted to V6ONLY can pick either IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as long as the source and destination matches. A helper, previously introduced is used to ease family matching checks, taking care of IPv4 vs IPv4-mapped-IPv6 vs IPv6 only addresses. Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/269 Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts --- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------= ---- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index b5505b8167f9..db07cc5b4fcb 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ static struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry * select_local_address(const struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_sock *msk) { - const struct sock *sk =3D (const struct sock *)msk; struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, *ret =3D NULL; =20 msk_owned_by_me(msk); @@ -165,16 +164,6 @@ select_local_address(const struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, if (!test_bit(entry->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap)) continue; =20 - if (entry->addr.family !=3D sk->sk_family) { -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6) - if ((entry->addr.family =3D=3D AF_INET && - !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_daddr)) || - (sk->sk_family =3D=3D AF_INET && - !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&entry->addr.addr6))) -#endif - continue; - } - ret =3D entry; break; } @@ -423,7 +412,9 @@ static bool lookup_address_in_vec(const struct mptcp_ad= dr_info *addrs, unsigned /* Fill all the remote addresses into the array addrs[], * and return the array size. */ -static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk, bool= fullmesh, +static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + struct mptcp_addr_info *local, + bool fullmesh, struct mptcp_addr_info *addrs) { bool deny_id0 =3D READ_ONCE(msk->pm.remote_deny_join_id0); @@ -443,6 +434,9 @@ static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mp= tcp_sock *msk, bool fullm if (deny_id0) return 0; =20 + if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, local, &remote)) + return 0; + msk->pm.subflows++; addrs[i++] =3D remote; } else { @@ -453,6 +447,9 @@ static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mp= tcp_sock *msk, bool fullm if (deny_id0 && !addrs[i].id) continue; =20 + if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, local, &addrs[i])) + continue; + if (!lookup_address_in_vec(addrs, i, &addrs[i]) && msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) { msk->pm.subflows++; @@ -603,9 +600,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(str= uct mptcp_sock *msk) fullmesh =3D !!(local->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH); =20 msk->pm.local_addr_used++; - nr =3D fill_remote_addresses_vec(msk, fullmesh, addrs); - if (nr) - __clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); + __clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); + nr =3D fill_remote_addresses_vec(msk, &local->addr, fullmesh, addrs); + if (nr =3D=3D 0) + continue; + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); for (i =3D 0; i < nr; i++) __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local->addr, &addrs[i]); @@ -628,11 +627,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_established(struct mp= tcp_sock *msk) * and return the array size. */ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + struct mptcp_addr_info *remote, struct mptcp_addr_info *addrs) { struct sock *sk =3D (struct sock *)msk; struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry; - struct mptcp_addr_info local; struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet; unsigned int subflows_max; int i =3D 0; @@ -645,15 +644,8 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mp= tcp_sock *msk, if (!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH)) continue; =20 - if (entry->addr.family !=3D sk->sk_family) { -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6) - if ((entry->addr.family =3D=3D AF_INET && - !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_daddr)) || - (sk->sk_family =3D=3D AF_INET && - !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&entry->addr.addr6))) -#endif - continue; - } + if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &entry->addr, remote)) + continue; =20 if (msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) { msk->pm.subflows++; @@ -666,8 +658,18 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mp= tcp_sock *msk, * 'IPADDRANY' local address */ if (!i) { + struct mptcp_addr_info local; + memset(&local, 0, sizeof(local)); - local.family =3D msk->pm.remote.family; + local.family =3D +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6) + remote->family =3D=3D AF_INET6 && + ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&remote->addr6) ? AF_INET : +#endif + remote->family; + + if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &local, remote)) + return 0; =20 msk->pm.subflows++; addrs[i++] =3D local; @@ -706,7 +708,9 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_= sock *msk) /* connect to the specified remote address, using whatever * local address the routing configuration will pick. */ - nr =3D fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, addrs); + nr =3D fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, &remote, addrs); + if (nr =3D=3D 0) + return; =20 msk->pm.add_addr_accepted++; if (msk->pm.add_addr_accepted >=3D add_addr_accept_max || --=20 2.38.1