From nobody Sun Dec 14 06:36:37 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) client-ip=8.43.85.245; envelope-from=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; helo=lists.libvirt.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass(p=reject dis=none) header.from=lists.libvirt.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1751641031; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=H7f1xw6cdTTMFyqHjke1xZhlXtzHAroG1Y3F/BarfQ9FZStlZrYGfJdpt0O6Yzb7+Vz5RJ+CjtfjuvK2tbCRY8YUDeZ8eRw9poU2YDyogOC+DpLMYlFfVLunscbBqat8l68atYPeFb7ichrYsmOtn6ljXsmFDc9wzI11pK8h/aE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1751641031; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Cc; bh=wIFZN8bt0MR9ftt1fo5/zNoyBo9EjXXtnrXPARwavcY=; b=m58F7GTCWfB97BLroVTMFWEkkI1ZFkwOWL2crIGokUgkmVLOIF3wPBSDg9s6AKFkw8l+Nnb6Y1gXDEFpcw5q3uxPIyAhsvYieVZjC8JD7EjbHm+uLcTapRqAMzgIDokqPXEDcBAzJuNh8/NPXoloAAnpQJJFUUDAeGMUXt/AzjI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=reject dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.libvirt.org (lists.libvirt.org [8.43.85.245]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1751641031003749.5166855071315; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 07:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id 08958138E; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists.libvirt.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E88145B; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:56:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id D7C67138E; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F781385 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-679-RMNxQ_peOuOsg7PI6VZhLQ-1; Fri, 04 Jul 2025 10:56:47 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6221800287 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orkuz (unknown [10.45.225.129]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434293000218 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on lists.libvirt.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1751641008; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oTeKP963f1ASq5nl6w4kzCkgImFJYASpkldTJjomlH0=; b=SqG8oUi1cW7xox4B7jwCcBmvOGbsHADAGq5ANce8j6tgpBVyjL5mLvgaNet26g2xjnyyXN ijpr9Vf6nntj8B2ZLLRzrh4MBgf926X+RFJPRIAns4H25ewaAVQhyWFqvASo+yT2WiOYsC OdG90GU31nnqtXVAtUCCPbHMXMpad2Q= X-MC-Unique: RMNxQ_peOuOsg7PI6VZhLQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: RMNxQ_peOuOsg7PI6VZhLQ_1751641006 To: devel@lists.libvirt.org Subject: [PATCH 7/6] NEWS: Mention virConnectHypervisorBaselineCPU improvements Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: EW2yGYmvTlQNpQ-cUotx2_pvrSBVpVekRjpEOLmJPts_1751641006 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: J3ZXNKUPEGZ6IIKGBW7SUVZ7TLLZRDLH X-Message-ID-Hash: J3ZXNKUPEGZ6IIKGBW7SUVZ7TLLZRDLH X-MailFrom: jdenemar@redhat.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-config-1; header-match-config-2; header-match-config-3; header-match-devel.lists.libvirt.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.2.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Jiri Denemark via Devel Reply-To: Jiri Denemark X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1751641031843116600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Jiri Denemark Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa --- NEWS.rst | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst index d8bd2559f4..4fd12d94f4 100644 --- a/NEWS.rst +++ b/NEWS.rst @@ -17,8 +17,20 @@ v11.6.0 (unreleased) =20 * **New features** =20 + * Introduce VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_IGNORE_HOST flag + + This new flag for virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU can be used for comp= uting + a baseline CPU on any host without being limited to hosts represented = by + the input CPU definitions. + * **Improvements** =20 + * Clarify documentation of virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU + + The documentation makes it clear virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU is + supposed to be called on one of the hosts represented in the input CPU + definitions. Otherwise the API will give unexpected results. + * **Bug fixes** =20 =20 --=20 2.50.0