From nobody Mon Sep 8 21:39:50 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) client-ip=8.43.85.245; envelope-from=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; helo=lists.libvirt.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass(p=reject dis=none) header.from=lists.libvirt.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1747383001; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=NqecLEnGOnRYv45zAW2roFgAYJ2shUGafRvytRcR+gKUKxoHZl45AkenIclg7nj2/kzq+dtj4d1Qx9PuajVxKiDR3A2khnalZ0q+L07Al8ZKbirJCGffaeZSVMbQWCzZSeJCkTAct8FEcBPTHh9UcakeMZsMFWl62Ju5MyTy7no= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1747383001; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Cc; bh=o8j10Rk+lppcN0fY4O2aMKdtz4mj8XI7YjkiomEc2xQ=; b=FHajBExJ6omljD2Sp4hH/YuE0AuEITmGVD0VdrCVB8vbCZYa/pyKeaJFcB2oEwp8YNEpG+KScrgF+VScELefPKq7BwrfgPKfWHXFpx8nqoWS9udOM+MdRfJOfVta+MG9fq/TGTMbt+UYXJF4f0eYABDjzGNduNojUq+QEDeVYUE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=reject dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.libvirt.org (lists.libvirt.org [8.43.85.245]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1747383001482435.4004038153952; Fri, 16 May 2025 01:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id 7D33D1560; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists.libvirt.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90989157A; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id 89911B75; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1112F11DD for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-551-0nrSytUYNb-Vl5A6zXffsg-1; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:19 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC5C1955F44 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moe.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.3.236]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D77530075D5 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:09:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on lists.libvirt.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1747382960; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qU7svoN32F0ZZ9sEJ7KHZzJpUeHGphUkIYxjFBbyEP8=; b=NRxhEV2tTT3OMrlY2r2p817cbCwdt92o99aBE1bPF3hl5SHJSptQ+BeSr0slJCV1p9nHxv LBvCDEd17nGVy5ETLN4aUYEZyc+EB21BKK1CetsoVLLmQY8ftjA38iEpH62oGkHIvjfm+E 2DmQDxwKfCZSBi16jibgqoP8pwcyfLQ= X-MC-Unique: 0nrSytUYNb-Vl5A6zXffsg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 0nrSytUYNb-Vl5A6zXffsg_1747382959 To: devel@lists.libvirt.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] spec: Bump min_rhel Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:09:12 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: dJnm4pNHmILHtzYLRP-OFgDsgNlL2spv0I04bdmj5wo_1747382959 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: FIBUZCH73VH4KVZWXAE2ZX5PGDRQY7ZC X-Message-ID-Hash: FIBUZCH73VH4KVZWXAE2ZX5PGDRQY7ZC X-MailFrom: mprivozn@redhat.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-config-1; header-match-config-2; header-match-config-3; header-match-devel.lists.libvirt.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.2.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Michal Privoznik via Devel Reply-To: Michal Privoznik X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1747383002552116600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; x-default="true" From: Michal Privoznik RHEL-8 is out of our support scope. The minimal version we aim to support upstream is RHEL-9. Reflect this in the spec file. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik Reviewed-by: J=C3=A1n Tomko --- libvirt.spec.in | 32 +++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index e12bec18d5..59e144ce4b 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -3,17 +3,15 @@ # This spec file assumes you are building on a Fedora or RHEL version # that's still supported by the vendor. It may work on other distros # or versions, but no effort will be made to ensure that going forward. -%define min_rhel 8 +%define min_rhel 9 %define min_fedora 37 =20 %define arches_qemu_kvm %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} %{arm} aarch64 s= 390x riscv64 %if 0%{?rhel} %if 0%{?rhel} >=3D 10 %define arches_qemu_kvm x86_64 aarch64 s390x riscv64 - %elif 0%{?rhel} >=3D 9 + %else %define arches_qemu_kvm x86_64 aarch64 s390x - %else - %define arches_qemu_kvm x86_64 %{power64} aarch64 s390x %endif %endif =20 @@ -74,15 +72,8 @@ =20 %define with_storage_gluster 0%{!?_without_storage_gluster:1} %if 0%{?rhel} - # Glusterfs has been dropped in RHEL-9, and before that - # was only enabled on arches where KVM exists - %if 0%{?rhel} > 8 - %define with_storage_gluster 0 - %else - %ifnarch %{arches_qemu_kvm} - %define with_storage_gluster 0 - %endif - %endif + # Glusterfs has been dropped in RHEL-9. + %define with_storage_gluster 0 %endif =20 # Fedora had zfs-fuse until F43 @@ -94,7 +85,7 @@ =20 %define with_storage_iscsi_direct 0%{!?_without_storage_iscsi_direct:1} # libiscsi has been dropped in RHEL-9 -%if 0%{?rhel} > 8 +%if 0%{?rhel} %define with_storage_iscsi_direct 0 %endif =20 @@ -150,10 +141,6 @@ =20 %define with_firewalld_zone 0%{!?_without_firewalld_zone:1} =20 -%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 9 - %define with_netcf 0%{!?_without_netcf:1} -%endif - # fuse is used to provide virtualized /proc for LXC %if %{with_lxc} %define with_fuse 0%{!?_without_fuse:1} @@ -195,8 +182,7 @@ # Right now that's not the case anywhere, but things should be fine by the= time # Fedora 40 is released. %if %{with_qemu} - # rhel-8 lacks pidfd_open - %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >=3D 9 + %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} %define with_nbdkit 0%{!?_without_nbdkit:1} =20 # setting 'with_nbdkit_config_default' must be done only when comp= iling @@ -215,7 +201,7 @@ %endif =20 %define with_modular_daemons 0 -%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >=3D 9 +%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} %define with_modular_daemons 1 %endif =20 @@ -275,7 +261,7 @@ =20 # Fedora and RHEL-9 are new enough to support /dev/userfaultfd, which # does not require enabling vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd sysctl. -%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >=3D 9 +%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} %define with_userfaultfd_sysctl 0 %endif =20 @@ -856,7 +842,7 @@ Requires: swtpm-tools %if %{with_numad} Requires: numad %endif - %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >=3D 9 + %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} Recommends: passt Recommends: passt-selinux %endif --=20 2.49.0 From nobody Mon Sep 8 21:39:50 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) client-ip=8.43.85.245; envelope-from=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; helo=lists.libvirt.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass(p=reject dis=none) header.from=lists.libvirt.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1747383022; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Krh6FYptGzfAVvuTWnOvbDJjVFIJsrB0AqUaIxvsRgEJaUSzrkhY0+VfKF1HrerSNMf94shK0afne5uEuCWR3UdbfFbXV9xnDrP3XfKglJ1UQX+xWcLruOHgNSLRijYkSq83g/OKpIK76k2Erv9O2vGoxVsb1pIQpAa8ZUU0tJw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1747383022; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Cc; bh=ndOXSzS451AUz/svCfMKA4OsHMRY1RK8/bBb0+q+A4c=; b=Q/7E/zqUmVFiA20C8zheVL+PrmrN6iBvDRiHxtigfkyTmEt3z+/mhX6DeP3VH6m/D33bIliCgEcerD5r5YjjgEXe/m0kCpzX1n0c8N1Anniw77lu3BPiqGqxymiq4jgsiXySCms60M8ecdtcU8cv0Ef+JUCIARwLeAXZqE5QcwY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.libvirt.org designates 8.43.85.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=devel-bounces@lists.libvirt.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=reject dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.libvirt.org (lists.libvirt.org [8.43.85.245]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1747383022328672.301316588491; Fri, 16 May 2025 01:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id 507C014DA; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:10:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists.libvirt.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505DD1415; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix, from userid 996) id 281851546; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.libvirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416C511DD for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-221-GLfZyH8rPpypGHDhVq_yNQ-1; Fri, 16 May 2025 04:09:20 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164E018002A5 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moe.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.3.236]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F7530075D5 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:09:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on lists.libvirt.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1747382963; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tmVLs74Yhm5+tZdK76EM6dnT14Xi//ZwEvU9bKuj/o8=; b=Xi+uJ2hr80JNUUdMul/Cg2YF07NsYywxMWGnVdb9V3mS9aVr43VUSzd6/6eE8TuPkHgLtu uPRlpOvJRmXWKolaLHki2HO/AlS1X6c9/0Pt4CRroSlgZ/7LSBlc8JsNYZh21d3i3sKH7h rxl8zsMAhB6rwt25vCKttGU+Z8oObdY= X-MC-Unique: GLfZyH8rPpypGHDhVq_yNQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: GLfZyH8rPpypGHDhVq_yNQ_1747382960 To: devel@lists.libvirt.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] spec: Bump min_fedora Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:09:13 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: rYXXGayNefMLfFJ-opf0DTipDKt1u3UJYQr4IYOdD9g_1747382960 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: RG66OYKH4IFOXIMYUNVQ7DDKCQKULTPF X-Message-ID-Hash: RG66OYKH4IFOXIMYUNVQ7DDKCQKULTPF X-MailFrom: mprivozn@redhat.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-config-1; header-match-config-2; header-match-config-3; header-match-devel.lists.libvirt.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.2.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Michal Privoznik via Devel Reply-To: Michal Privoznik X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1747383022861116600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; x-default="true" From: Michal Privoznik Fedora 40 is now officially at end of life [1]. The minimal version we aim to support upstream is thus Fedora 41. Reflect this in the spec file. 1: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedor= aproject.org/thread/XCUBN7NR7LXFFSA3IJDRTGHC7K4CXARV/ Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik Reviewed-by: J=C3=A1n Tomko --- libvirt.spec.in | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 59e144ce4b..fd1e2d28c0 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # that's still supported by the vendor. It may work on other distros # or versions, but no effort will be made to ensure that going forward. %define min_rhel 9 -%define min_fedora 37 +%define min_fedora 41 =20 %define arches_qemu_kvm %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} %{arm} aarch64 s= 390x riscv64 %if 0%{?rhel} @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ # # TODO: add RHEL 9 once a minor release that contains the necessar= y SELinux # bits exists (we only support the most recent minor release) - %if 0%{?fedora} >=3D 40 + %if 0%{?fedora} %define with_nbdkit_config_default 0%{!?_without_nbdkit_config= _default:1} %endif %endif @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ =20 # Prefer nftables for future OS releases but keep using iptables # for existing ones -%if 0%{?rhel} >=3D 10 || 0%{?fedora} >=3D 41 +%if 0%{?rhel} >=3D 10 || 0%{?fedora} %define prefer_nftables 1 %define firewall_backend_priority nftables,iptables %else --=20 2.49.0