From nobody Sat May 4 22:09:14 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1550158228992324.22533097116684; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 07:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8078A89AE4; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908D44CC; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DD4181A00C; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x1EFULPj010674 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:30:21 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 9AD3A4A6; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moe.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223CB5F9C1 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Michal Privoznik To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:30:16 +0100 Message-Id: <34f516edc1b8b3a480a7e2c0121a224d3a13109b.1550158216.git.mprivozn@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH] virkmodtest: Don't fail if modprobe doesn't exist X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On some very basic installations (e.g. some container images) the modprobe binary might be missing. If that is the case, don't fail virkmodtest. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- tests/virkmodtest.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/virkmodtest.c b/tests/virkmodtest.c index c90830a23c..80029244ff 100644 --- a/tests/virkmodtest.c +++ b/tests/virkmodtest.c @@ -46,7 +46,12 @@ testKModConfig(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) */ outbuf =3D virKModConfig(); if (!outbuf) { - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get config\n"); + if (virFileIsExecutable(MODPROBE)) { + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get config\n"); + } else { + /* modprobe doesn't exist, do not claim error. */ + ret =3D 0; + } goto cleanup; } ret =3D 0; --=20 2.19.2 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list