On 4/29/19 12:32 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> firmware attribute from <os/> takes either 'efi' or 'bios' as its
> allowed values. However, the current documentation mistakenly mentions
> 'uefi' instead of 'efi'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> index d27ab07cbb..e1da878fcc 100644
> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
>
> <pre>
> ...
> -<os firmware='uefi'>
> +<os firmware='efi'>
> <type>hvm</type>
> <loader readonly='yes' secure='no' type='rom'>/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader</loader>
> <nvram template='/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd'>/var/lib/libvirt/nvram/guest_VARS.fd</nvram>
>
ACKed and pushed.
Thanks,
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list