From nobody Sun May 5 12:19:36 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519303787465118.64614674681513; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E895F73C; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E75D5D9C5; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC218033EB; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1MCnjJP009190 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 07:49:45 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E8D26AF037; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460.redhat.com (unknown [10.33.36.6]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1882CAF02C; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:41 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:40 +0000 Message-Id: <20180222124940.6487-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH] rpm: don't enable fuse on RHEL-6 X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:49:46 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Fuse was recently enabled whereever LXC is enabled: commit 34783a9e6b9c3d8850db878fc323c1ff40703ea6 Author: Jiri Denemark Date: Fri Feb 9 13:42:50 2018 +0100 spec: Enable fuse only if LXC is enabled Unfortunately the version of Fuse in RHEL-6 is too old for libvirt's needs, but we still have LXC enabled there. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- Pushed as a CI build fix libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index e1e902c5e4..1eca4e39d4 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ %endif =20 # fuse is used to provide virtualized /proc for LXC -%if %{with_lxc} +%if %{with_lxc} && 0%{?rhel} !=3D 6 %define with_fuse 0%{!?_without_fuse:1} %endif =20 --=20 2.14.3 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list