From nobody Sun Feb 8 05:40:53 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 151871373899353.65405878870865; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:55:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B5AF5B2FB; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A52660CA8; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C231841C78; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1FGi50n025825 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:44:05 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id B6F9D2026609; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.42.22.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599222024CA8; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:44:05 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:43:29 +0000 Message-Id: <20180215164347.11538-25-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180215164347.11538-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20180215164347.11538-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 24/42] openvz: add default: case to all switch statements X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:55:38 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Even if the compiler has validated that all enum constants have case statements in a switch, it is not safe to omit a default: case statement. When assigning a value to a variable / struct field that is defined with an enum type, nothing prevents an invalid value being assigned. So defensive code must assume existance of invalid values and thus all switches should have a default: case. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- src/openvz/openvz_driver.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/openvz/openvz_driver.c b/src/openvz/openvz_driver.c index 9bd73d85c4..6c434dd13c 100644 --- a/src/openvz/openvz_driver.c +++ b/src/openvz/openvz_driver.c @@ -1866,6 +1866,9 @@ openvzDomainGetMemoryParameters(virDomainPtr domain, VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG, val) < 0) goto cleanup; break; + + default: + break; } } =20 --=20 2.14.3 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list