From nobody Wed Dec 17 06:08:43 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1517844843521235.03540111048426; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:34:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB757CBAB; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 643BC4141; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1424A471; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w15FSn4w002897 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:28:49 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id BF72B5EE01; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.42.22.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFC45D6A2; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:28:23 +0000 Message-Id: <20180205152829.12577-10-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180205152829.12577-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20180205152829.12577-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Cc: Peter Krempa Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH v3 09/15] network: remove conditional declarations X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:34:03 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 The networkDnsmasqConfContents() method is only used by the test suite and that's only built with WITH_NETWORK is set. So there is no longer any reason to conditionalize the declaration of this method. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- src/network/bridge_driver.h | 9 --------- 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.h b/src/network/bridge_driver.h index 2cf886a7e6..b70881a690 100644 --- a/src/network/bridge_driver.h +++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.h @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ int networkRegister(void); =20 -# if WITH_NETWORK - int networkDnsmasqConfContents(virNetworkObjPtr obj, const char *pidfile, @@ -43,11 +41,4 @@ networkDnsmasqConfContents(virNetworkObjPtr obj, dnsmasqContext *dctx, dnsmasqCapsPtr caps); =20 -# else -/* Define no-op replacements that don't drag in any link dependencies. */ -# define networkDnsmasqConfContents(network, pidfile, configstr, \ - dctx, caps) 0 - -# endif - #endif /* __VIR_NETWORK__DRIVER_H */ --=20 2.14.3 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list