diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
index cf2d6b4cda..c0c694be55 100644
--- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
+++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
@@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
ioctl (Private->fd, DKIOCGETMAXBLOCKCOUNTWRITE, &Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity);
}
+ #elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
+ {
+ u_int BlockSize;
+ off_t DiskSize;
+
+ if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGSECTORSIZE, &BlockSize) == 0) {
+ Private->Media->BlockSize = BlockSize;
+ }
+
+ if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGMEDIASIZE, &DiskSize) == 0) {
+ Private->NumberOfBlocks = DivU64x32 (DiskSize, (UINT32)BlockSize);
+ Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
+ }
+ }
#else
{
size_t BlockSize;
@@ -154,7 +168,7 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
if (fstatfs (Private->fd, &buf) == 0) {
- #if __APPLE__
+ #if __APPLE__ || _NETBSD_SOURCE
Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity = buf.f_iosize/buf.f_bsize;
#else
Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity = buf.f_bsize/buf.f_bsize;
diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
index 38c01c84af..c505300129 100644
--- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
+++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
@@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
#define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON
#endif
+#ifdef _NETBSD_SOURCE
+#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1)
+#else
+#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (0)
+#endif
+
//
// Globals
//
@@ -187,7 +193,7 @@ main (
//
InitialStackMemorySize = STACK_SIZE;
InitialStackMemory = (UINTN)MapMemory (
- 0,
+ MAP_ANON_FD_,
(UINT32)InitialStackMemorySize,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE
@@ -348,6 +354,7 @@ MapMemory (
while ((!isAligned) && (base != 0)) {
res = mmap ((void *)base, length, prot, flags, fd, 0);
if (res == MAP_FAILED) {
+ perror("MapMemory");
return NULL;
}
@@ -640,7 +647,7 @@ SecUnixPeiAutoScan (
*MemoryBase = 0;
res = MapMemory (
- 0,
+ MAP_ANON_FD_,
gSystemMemory[Index].Size,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS
diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
index 0c81cdfc01..0de925adaf 100644
--- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
+++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
#if __CYGWIN__
#include <sys/dirent.h>
+#elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
+ #include <dirent.h>
#else
#include <sys/dir.h>
#endif
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
#include <net/if.h>
#include <ifaddrs.h>
-#ifdef __APPLE__
+#if defined(__APPLE__)
#include <net/if_dl.h>
#include <net/bpf.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
@@ -65,6 +67,9 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
#ifndef _Bool
#define _Bool char // for clang debug
#endif
+#elif defined(_NETBSD_SOURCE)
+ #define statfs statvfs
+ #define fstatfs fstatvfs
#else
#include <termio.h>
#include <sys/vfs.h>
signed-off-by: Thierry LARONDE <tlaronde@polynum.com>
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#96521): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96521
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95182515/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:21 PM <tlaronde@polynum.com> wrote: > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > index cf2d6b4cda..c0c694be55 100644 > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > @@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice ( > > ioctl (Private->fd, DKIOCGETMAXBLOCKCOUNTWRITE, > &Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity); > } > + #elif _NETBSD_SOURCE > + { > + u_int BlockSize; > Hi, Again, thanks for the patches. Please send them in the way I kind of described in my other reply. s/u_int/UINT/ + off_t DiskSize; > I think this off_t is fine, per the other off_t usages, I don't know if the maintainers agree. > + > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGSECTORSIZE, &BlockSize) == 0) { > + Private->Media->BlockSize = BlockSize; > + } > + > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGMEDIASIZE, &DiskSize) == 0) { > + Private->NumberOfBlocks = DivU64x32 (DiskSize, > (UINT32)BlockSize); > + Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1; > + } > + } > #else > { > size_t BlockSize; > > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > index 38c01c84af..c505300129 100644 > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent > #define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON > #endif > > +#ifdef _NETBSD_SOURCE > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1) > +#else > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (0) > +#endif > Would there be a harm if we just passed -1 everywhere? It's a bit odd NetBSD explicitly requires this, but AFAIK implementations either EINVAL on fd != -1 or take whatever since it's anon. The main implementations (Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, macOS) seem to agree that passing -1 should be safe everywhere (in fact, it's pretty funny that all BSD-derived implementations agree with the fd = -1 thing, but I digress). The rest of the patch looks mostly ok to me, but then again, I'm not a maintainer for this. Thanks, Pedro -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96524): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96524 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95182515/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello Pedro, Le Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:32:51PM +0000, Pedro Falcato a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:21 PM <tlaronde@polynum.com> wrote: > > > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > > b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > > index cf2d6b4cda..c0c694be55 100644 > > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c > > @@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice ( > > > > ioctl (Private->fd, DKIOCGETMAXBLOCKCOUNTWRITE, > > &Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity); > > } > > + #elif _NETBSD_SOURCE > > + { > > + u_int BlockSize; > > > Hi, > > Again, thanks for the patches. Please send them in the way I kind of > described in my other reply. > > s/u_int/UINT/ > > + off_t DiskSize; > > > I think this off_t is fine, per the other off_t usages, I don't know if the > maintainers agree. > > > + > > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGSECTORSIZE, &BlockSize) == 0) { > > + Private->Media->BlockSize = BlockSize; > > + } > > + > > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGMEDIASIZE, &DiskSize) == 0) { > > + Private->NumberOfBlocks = DivU64x32 (DiskSize, > > (UINT32)BlockSize); > > + Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1; > > + } > > + } > > #else > > { > > size_t BlockSize; > > > > > > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > > index 38c01c84af..c505300129 100644 > > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c > > @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent > > #define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON > > #endif > > > > +#ifdef _NETBSD_SOURCE > > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1) > > +#else > > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (0) > > +#endif > > > Would there be a harm if we just passed -1 everywhere? It's a bit odd > NetBSD explicitly requires this, but AFAIK implementations > either EINVAL on fd != -1 or take whatever since it's anon. The main > implementations (Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, macOS) seem to > agree that passing -1 should be safe everywhere (in fact, it's pretty funny > that all BSD-derived implementations agree with the fd = -1 thing, but I > digress). Since MAP_ANON is not specified by POSIX1, I tend to think that what is not in POSIX should be explicitely set in the code. So if other OSes (with which edk2 is used) agree on (-1), my personal taste would be to keep at least the define macro: #define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1) as an indication that the definition is not standard (so that someone with a system choking on this, could easily spot the culprit). (The trailing underscore is because leading ones shall be reserved for standard or system implementation, and the trailing is a way to indicate that the macro is somehow local. Is there a convention for this in EDK2?) Best, -- Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com> http://www.kergis.com/ http://kertex.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96544): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96544 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95182515/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2023 Red Hat, Inc.