Hi Ard,
Thank you for the feedback.
I will fix this in the v2 series.
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 23/05/2023 02:32 pm, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 15:04, Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com> wrote:
>> According to edk2 coding standard specification, Non-Boolean
>> comparisons must use a compare operator (==, !=, >, < >=, <=).
>> See Section 5.7.2.1 at https://edk2-docs.gitbook.io/
>> edk-ii-c-coding-standards-specification/5_source_files/
>> 57_c_programming
>>
>> Therefore, fix the comparison in ArmGicEnableDistributor()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
>> ---
>> ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/ArmGicNonSecLib.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/ArmGicNonSecLib.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/ArmGicNonSecLib.c
>> index c17cbe041e8a9ceb8c8c3a6b953ff88b75f6f206..1ca66a40940434d6d89e243650f3e81aa3f588b5 100644
>> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/ArmGicNonSecLib.c
>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/ArmGicNonSecLib.c
>> @@ -26,7 +26,10 @@ ArmGicEnableDistributor (
>> if (Revision == ARM_GIC_ARCH_REVISION_2) {
>> MmioWrite32 (GicDistributorBase + ARM_GIC_ICDDCR, 0x1);
>> } else {
>> - if (MmioRead32 (GicDistributorBase + ARM_GIC_ICDDCR) & ARM_GIC_ICDDCR_ARE) {
>> + if ((MmioRead32 (
>> + GicDistributorBase + ARM_GIC_ICDDCR
>> + ) & ARM_GIC_ICDDCR_ARE) != 0)
>> + {
> This coding style is terrible. Mind using a temporary variable for the
> result of the MmioRead32() instead?
>
>> MmioOr32 (GicDistributorBase + ARM_GIC_ICDDCR, 0x2);
>> } else {
>> MmioOr32 (GicDistributorBase + ARM_GIC_ICDDCR, 0x1);
>> --
>> 'Guid(CE165669-3EF3-493F-B85D-6190EE5B9759)'
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#105199): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/105199
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/99086468/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-