From nobody Sat Nov 2 12:33:41 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) client-ip=198.145.21.10; envelope-from=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org; helo=ml01.01.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zoho.com; spf=none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) smtp.mailfrom=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org; Return-Path: Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1489652237869777.0618261407719; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56668803FE; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D75803FD for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2017 01:17:13 -0700 Received: from shwdeopenpsi068.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.9.22]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2017 01:17:12 -0700 X-Original-To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1489652233; x=1521188233; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=lFw9AtEoRJ//23o4C0Hnp9P4BU/Pf52nb8nqfWTtv8Q=; b=nSBz58nCDFfEYnmf0kCNE1XuucSkU4T40eD6kHZswtfL4tiHVI1blbcI nyKZunK/EXSU+JHtSRakfphJj8r8JQ==; X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,170,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="76020680" From: Star Zeng To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:17:09 +0800 Message-Id: <1489652229-8940-1-git-send-email-star.zeng@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0.windows.1 Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: Not make FADT.{DSDT, X_DSDT} mutual exclusion X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jiewen Yao , Laszlo Ersek , Jeff Fan , Star Zeng MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "edk2-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_4 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 198a46d768fb90d2f9b16e26451b4814e7469eaf improved the DSDT and X_DSDT fields mutual exclusion by checking FADT revision, but that breaks some OS that has assumption to only consume X_DSDT field even the DSDT address is < 4G. To have better compatibility, this patch is to update the code to not make FADT.{DSDT,X_DSDT} mutual exclusion, but always set both DSDT and X_DSDT fields in the FADT when the DSDT address is < 4G. Cc: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Jeff Fan Cc: Jiewen Yao Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Star Zeng NOTE: This patch comes out from the discussion at https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-March/008580.html. Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek Tested-by: Jeff Fan --- .../Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c | 88 +++++++++---------= ---- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c b= /MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c index 4bb848df5203..a4fd9aff845d 100644 --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c @@ -432,50 +432,6 @@ ReallocateAcpiTableBuffer ( } =20 /** - Determine whether the FADT table passed in as parameter requires mutual - exclusion between the DSDT and X_DSDT fields. (That is, whether there ex= ists - an explicit requirement that at most one of those fields is permitted to= be - nonzero.) - - @param[in] Fadt The EFI_ACPI_3_0_FIXED_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_TABLE object to - check. - - @retval TRUE Fadt requires mutual exclusion between DSDT and X_DSDT. - @retval FALSE Otherwise. -**/ -BOOLEAN -RequireDsdtXDsdtExclusion ( - IN EFI_ACPI_3_0_FIXED_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_TABLE *Fadt - ) -{ - // - // Mantis ticket #1393 was addressed in ACPI 5.1 Errata B. Unfortunately= , we - // can't tell apart 5.1 Errata A and 5.1 Errata B just from looking at t= he - // FADT table. Therefore let's require exclusion for table versions >=3D= 5.1. - // - // While this needlessly covers 5.1 and 5.1A too, it is safer to require - // DSDT<->X_DSDT exclusion for lax (5.1, 5.1A) versions of the spec than= to - // permit DSDT<->X_DSDT duplication for strict (5.1B) versions of the sp= ec. - // - // The same applies to 6.0 vs. 6.0A. While 6.0 does not require the - // exclusion, 6.0A and 6.1 do. Since we cannot distinguish 6.0 from 6.0A - // based on just the FADT, we lump 6.0 in with the rest of >=3D 5.1. - // - if ((Fadt->Header.Revision < 5) || - ((Fadt->Header.Revision =3D=3D 5) && - (((EFI_ACPI_5_1_FIXED_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_TABLE *)Fadt)->MinorVersion = =3D=3D 0))) { - // - // version <=3D 5.0 - // - return FALSE; - } - // - // version >=3D 5.1 - // - return TRUE; -} - -/** This function adds an ACPI table to the table list. It will detect FACS= and allocate the correct type of memory and properly align the table. =20 @@ -692,11 +648,23 @@ AddTableToList ( } if ((UINT64)(UINTN)AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt3 < BASE_4GB) { AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt =3D (UINT32) (UINTN) AcpiTableInsta= nce->Dsdt3; - if (RequireDsdtXDsdtExclusion (AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3)) { - Buffer64 =3D 0; - } else { - Buffer64 =3D AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt; - } + // + // Comment block "the caller installs the tables in "DSDT, FADT" o= rder" + // The below comments are also in "the caller installs the tables = in "FADT, DSDT" order" comment block. + // + // The ACPI specification, up to and including revision 5.1 Errata= A, + // allows the DSDT and X_DSDT fields to be both set in the FADT. + // (Obviously, this only makes sense if the DSDT address is repres= entable in 4 bytes.) + // Starting with 5.1 Errata B, specifically for Mantis 1393 , + // the spec requires at most one of DSDT and X_DSDT fields to be s= et to a nonzero value, + // but strangely an exception is 6.0 that has no this requirement. + // + // Here we do not make the DSDT and X_DSDT fields mutual exclusion= conditionally + // by checking FADT revision, but always set both DSDT and X_DSDT = fields in the FADT + // to have better compatibility as some OS may have assumption to = only consume X_DSDT + // field even the DSDT address is < 4G. + // + Buffer64 =3D AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt; } else { AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt =3D 0; Buffer64 =3D (UINT64) (UINTN) AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt3; @@ -896,11 +864,23 @@ AddTableToList ( if (AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3 !=3D NULL) { if ((UINT64)(UINTN)AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt3 < BASE_4GB) { AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt =3D (UINT32) (UINTN) AcpiTableIns= tance->Dsdt3; - if (RequireDsdtXDsdtExclusion (AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3)) { - Buffer64 =3D 0; - } else { - Buffer64 =3D AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt; - } + // + // Comment block "the caller installs the tables in "FADT, DSDT"= order" + // The below comments are also in "the caller installs the table= s in "DSDT, FADT" order" comment block. + // + // The ACPI specification, up to and including revision 5.1 Erra= ta A, + // allows the DSDT and X_DSDT fields to be both set in the FADT. + // (Obviously, this only makes sense if the DSDT address is repr= esentable in 4 bytes.) + // Starting with 5.1 Errata B, specifically for Mantis 1393 , + // the spec requires at most one of DSDT and X_DSDT fields to be= set to a nonzero value, + // but strangely an exception is 6.0 that has no this requiremen= t. + // + // Here we do not make the DSDT and X_DSDT fields mutual exclusi= on conditionally + // by checking FADT revision, but always set both DSDT and X_DSD= T fields in the FADT + // to have better compatibility as some OS may have assumption t= o only consume X_DSDT + // field even the DSDT address is < 4G. + // + Buffer64 =3D AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt; } else { AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt =3D 0; Buffer64 =3D (UINT64) (UINTN) AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt3; --=20 2.7.0.windows.1 _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel