On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:29:47AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 5/19/23 05:06, Yang Zhong wrote:
> >
> > Paolo, please help add below queued sgx fix into this PULL request, which was
> > missed from last time, thanks a lot!
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00841.html
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00896.html
>
> Isn't this commit 72497cff896fecf74306ed33626c30e43633cdd6?
>
> Author: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu Apr 6 02:40:41 2023 -0400
>
> target/i386: Change wrong XFRM value in SGX CPUID leaf
> The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}. As a result,
> SGX enclaves only supported SSE and x87 feature (xfrm=0x3).
> Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Message-Id: <20230406064041.420039-1-yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
Oh, So sorry for this,,, it's my fault.
I missed PULL email information for this patch,
Apr 21 Paolo Bonzini (1.4K) [PULL 16/25] target/i386: Change wrong XFRM value in SGX CPUID leaf
Regards,
Yang
> Paolo
>
>