.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The qtests are not stable in the msys2-32bit job yet - especially
the test-hmp and the qom-test are failing randomly. Until this is
fixed, let's better disable the qtests here again to avoid failing
CI tests.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml
index 22f794e537..a1d5790580 100644
--- a/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml
@@ -116,4 +116,5 @@ msys2-32bit:
- ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc '../configure --target-list=ppc64-softmmu
--disable-opengl'
- ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make'
- - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make check || { cat meson-logs/testlog.txt; exit 1; } ;'
+ - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make check MTESTARGS=\"--no-suite qtest\" ||
+ { cat meson-logs/testlog.txt; exit 1; }'
--
2.31.1
On 5/1/23 21:48, Thomas Huth wrote: > The qtests are not stable in the msys2-32bit job yet - especially > the test-hmp and the qom-test are failing randomly. Until this is > fixed, Who is gonna look after this? I'm not against this patch, but I'm afraid this config starts to bitrot more. That said, maybe it is time to deprecate the 32-bit hosts? > let's better disable the qtests here again to avoid failing > CI tests. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > .gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml > index 22f794e537..a1d5790580 100644 > --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml > +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml > @@ -116,4 +116,5 @@ msys2-32bit: > - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc '../configure --target-list=ppc64-softmmu > --disable-opengl' > - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make' > - - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make check || { cat meson-logs/testlog.txt; exit 1; } ;' > + - ..\msys64\usr\bin\bash -lc 'make check MTESTARGS=\"--no-suite qtest\" || > + { cat meson-logs/testlog.txt; exit 1; }'
On 05/01/2023 22.42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 5/1/23 21:48, Thomas Huth wrote: >> The qtests are not stable in the msys2-32bit job yet - especially >> the test-hmp and the qom-test are failing randomly. Until this is >> fixed, > > Who is gonna look after this? It certainly has to be someone who's got a proper Windows installation. I've now tried to debug the failures for two days via the gitlab-CI jobs, and that just does not work. The turnaround times are way to long, and I really cannot waste all my limited CI minutes for such problems. > I'm not against this patch, but I'm afraid this config starts to > bitrot more. It's not really a big step backward - the qtests have just been enabled there 3 weeks ago (see commit a35e2ee929741fd), so this is just restoring the state from the time before the qtests have been enabled for Windows. > That said, maybe it is time to deprecate the 32-bit > hosts? Certainly fine for me, but that's up to the Windows folks to decide. Maybe you could just suggest a patch to start the discussion? Thomas
Am 06.01.23 um 08:49 schrieb Thomas Huth: > On 05/01/2023 22.42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > That said, maybe it is time to deprecate the 32-bit > > hosts? > > Certainly fine for me, but that's up to the Windows folks to decide. > Maybe you could just suggest a patch to start the discussion? > > Thomas Download numbers from yesterday for my latest Windows installers: qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe - 243 qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 6540 On Wednesday the ratio was 288 : 3516. As expected the 64-bit variant is used much more often, but it looks like there is still a certain desire for the 32-bit variant. Stefan
On 06/01/2023 09.15, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 06.01.23 um 08:49 schrieb Thomas Huth: > >> On 05/01/2023 22.42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> >> > That said, maybe it is time to deprecate the 32-bit >> > hosts? >> >> Certainly fine for me, but that's up to the Windows folks to decide. Maybe >> you could just suggest a patch to start the discussion? >> >> Thomas > > > Download numbers from yesterday for my latest Windows installers: > > qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe - 243 > > qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 6540 > > On Wednesday the ratio was 288 : 3516. > > As expected the 64-bit variant is used much more often, but it looks like > there is still a certain desire for the 32-bit variant. OK, thanks. Could you maybe also check the browser types in the logs? ... I'm wondering whether a big part of those w32 downloads were just automatic web crawlers? Thomas
Am 06.01.23 um 09:19 schrieb Thomas Huth: > On 06/01/2023 09.15, Stefan Weil wrote: >> >> Download numbers from yesterday for my latest Windows installers: >> >> qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe - 243 >> >> qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 6540 >> >> On Wednesday the ratio was 288 : 3516. >> >> As expected the 64-bit variant is used much more often, but it looks >> like there is still a certain desire for the 32-bit variant. > > OK, thanks. Could you maybe also check the browser types in the logs? > ... I'm wondering whether a big part of those w32 downloads were just > automatic web crawlers? > > Thomas I now checked all downloads of the latests installers since 2022-12-30. qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe – 509 different IP addresses qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 5471 different IP addresses 339 unique IP addresses are common for 32- and 64-bit, either crawlers or people who simply got both variants. So there remain 170 IP addresses which only downloaded the 32-bit variant in the last week. I see 437 different strings for the browser type, but surprisingly none of them looks like a crawler. Stefan
On 6/1/23 09:19, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 06/01/2023 09.15, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Am 06.01.23 um 08:49 schrieb Thomas Huth: >> >>> On 05/01/2023 22.42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> >>> > That said, maybe it is time to deprecate the 32-bit >>> > hosts? >>> >>> Certainly fine for me, but that's up to the Windows folks to decide. >>> Maybe you could just suggest a patch to start the discussion? >>> >>> Thomas >> >> >> Download numbers from yesterday for my latest Windows installers: >> >> qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe - 243 >> >> qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 6540 >> >> On Wednesday the ratio was 288 : 3516. >> >> As expected the 64-bit variant is used much more often, but it looks >> like there is still a certain desire for the 32-bit variant. > > OK, thanks. Could you maybe also check the browser types in the logs? > ... I'm wondering whether a big part of those w32 downloads were just > automatic web crawlers? Or people downloading both variants "just in case" but only install the 64-bit one ;)
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.