1. Patchew
  2. QEMU
  3. View series

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Forbid unprivileged mode for M Baseline

Julia Suvorova via Qemu-devel posted 1 patch 7 years, 7 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20180704203639.29553-1-jusual@mail.ru
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test s390x passed
There is a newer version of this series
target/arm/helper.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Forbid unprivileged mode for M Baseline
Posted by Julia Suvorova via Qemu-devel 7 years, 7 months ago 
MSR handling is the only place where CONTROL.nPRIV is modified.

Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru>
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 5ee229eb35..83cca554ad 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -10781,8 +10781,10 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, uint32_t val)
             !arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
             write_v7m_control_spsel(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
         }
-        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
-        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
+        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_MAIN)) {
+            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
+            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
+        }
         break;
     default:
     bad_reg:
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Forbid unprivileged mode for M Baseline
Posted by Peter Maydell 7 years, 7 months ago 
On 4 July 2018 at 21:36, Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru> wrote:
> MSR handling is the only place where CONTROL.nPRIV is modified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru>
> ---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 5ee229eb35..83cca554ad 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -10781,8 +10781,10 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, uint32_t val)
>              !arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>              write_v7m_control_spsel(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
>          }
> -        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> -        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> +        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_MAIN)) {
> +            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> +            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> +        }
>          break;
>      default:
>      bad_reg:
> --

Could you also guard the similar code in the CONTROL_NS case a
little earlier, in the function, please?

            env->v7m.control[M_REG_NS] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
            env->v7m.control[M_REG_NS] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;

That won't be executed for v6M but for v8M it matters.

Otherwise I agree this is all we need to do to avoid the guest
incorrectly getting into nonpriviliged mode.

thanks
-- PMM
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Forbid unprivileged mode for M Baseline
Posted by Julia Suvorova via Qemu-devel 7 years, 7 months ago 
On 05.07.2018 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 July 2018 at 21:36, Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru> wrote:
>> MSR handling is the only place where CONTROL.nPRIV is modified.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru>
>> ---
>>   target/arm/helper.c | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
>> index 5ee229eb35..83cca554ad 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
>> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
>> @@ -10781,8 +10781,10 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, uint32_t val)
>>               !arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>>               write_v7m_control_spsel(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
>>           }
>> -        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
>> -        env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
>> +        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_MAIN)) {
>> +            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
>> +            env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
>> +        }
>>           break;
>>       default:
>>       bad_reg:
>> --
> 
> Could you also guard the similar code in the CONTROL_NS case a
> little earlier, in the function, please?
> 
>              env->v7m.control[M_REG_NS] &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
>              env->v7m.control[M_REG_NS] |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> 
> That won't be executed for v6M but for v8M it matters.

Sure, I'll send v2.

Best regards, Julia Suvorova.

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.