Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
hw/core/register.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/register.c b/hw/core/register.c
index d2d1636250..8ed7c6b927 100644
--- a/hw/core/register.c
+++ b/hw/core/register.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void register_write_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
}
if (!reg) {
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
"at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
return;
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint64_t register_read_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
}
if (!reg) {
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
"at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
return 0;
}
--
2.18.0.rc2
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/core/register.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/register.c b/hw/core/register.c
> index d2d1636250..8ed7c6b927 100644
> --- a/hw/core/register.c
> +++ b/hw/core/register.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void register_write_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> }
>
> if (!reg) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
> "at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
> return;
> }
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint64_t register_read_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> }
>
> if (!reg) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
> "at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
I'm not sure this is correct. These can be unimplemented because there
are gaps in the register memory map, so it is a guest error.
Alistair
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.18.0.rc2
>
>
On 06/22/2018 04:49 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> hw/core/register.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/core/register.c b/hw/core/register.c
>> index d2d1636250..8ed7c6b927 100644
>> --- a/hw/core/register.c
>> +++ b/hw/core/register.c
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void register_write_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>> }
>>
>> if (!reg) {
>> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: write to unimplemented register " \
>> "at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint64_t register_read_memory(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>> }
>>
>> if (!reg) {
>> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: read to unimplemented register " \
>> "at address: %#" PRIx64 "\n", reg_array->prefix, addr);
>
> I'm not sure this is correct. These can be unimplemented because there
> are gaps in the register memory map, so it is a guest error.
This is exactly what I was wondering, thanks for your comment, I'll
probably add a comment about it.
>
> Alistair
>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.18.0.rc2
>>
>>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.