target/m68k/op_helper.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
68000 CPUs do not save format in the exception stack frame.
This patch adds feature checking to prevent format saving for 68000.
m68k_ret() already includes this modification, this patch fixes
the exception processing function too.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
---
target/m68k/op_helper.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/m68k/op_helper.c b/target/m68k/op_helper.c
index 3a7f7f2..e367133 100644
--- a/target/m68k/op_helper.c
+++ b/target/m68k/op_helper.c
@@ -301,8 +301,11 @@ static inline void do_stack_frame(CPUM68KState *env, uint32_t *sp,
cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, addr);
break;
}
- *sp -= 2;
- cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2));
+ if (m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_QUAD_MULDIV)) {
+ /* all except 68000 */
+ *sp -= 2;
+ cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2));
+ }
*sp -= 4;
cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, retaddr);
*sp -= 2;
Le 13/04/2018 à 13:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk a écrit : > 68000 CPUs do not save format in the exception stack frame. > This patch adds feature checking to prevent format saving for 68000. > m68k_ret() already includes this modification, this patch fixes > the exception processing function too. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> > --- > target/m68k/op_helper.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/m68k/op_helper.c b/target/m68k/op_helper.c > index 3a7f7f2..e367133 100644 > --- a/target/m68k/op_helper.c > +++ b/target/m68k/op_helper.c > @@ -301,8 +301,11 @@ static inline void do_stack_frame(CPUM68KState *env, uint32_t *sp, > cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, addr); > break; > } > - *sp -= 2; > - cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2)); > + if (m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_QUAD_MULDIV)) { > + /* all except 68000 */ > + *sp -= 2; > + cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2)); > + } > *sp -= 4; > cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, retaddr); > *sp -= 2; > To be the exact counterpart of m68k_rte(), I think you should include the "switch () { }" into the "if () { }". Thanks, Laurent
> From: Laurent Vivier [mailto:laurent@vivier.eu] > Le 13/04/2018 à 13:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk a écrit : > > 68000 CPUs do not save format in the exception stack frame. > > This patch adds feature checking to prevent format saving for 68000. > > m68k_ret() already includes this modification, this patch fixes > > the exception processing function too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> > > --- > > target/m68k/op_helper.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/m68k/op_helper.c b/target/m68k/op_helper.c > > index 3a7f7f2..e367133 100644 > > --- a/target/m68k/op_helper.c > > +++ b/target/m68k/op_helper.c > > @@ -301,8 +301,11 @@ static inline void do_stack_frame(CPUM68KState *env, uint32_t *sp, > > cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, addr); > > break; > > } > > - *sp -= 2; > > - cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2)); > > + if (m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_QUAD_MULDIV)) { > > + /* all except 68000 */ > > + *sp -= 2; > > + cpu_stw_kernel(env, *sp, (format << 12) + (cs->exception_index << 2)); > > + } > > *sp -= 4; > > cpu_stl_kernel(env, *sp, retaddr); > > *sp -= 2; > > > > To be the exact counterpart of m68k_rte(), I think you should include > the "switch () { }" into the "if () { }". That's right, thank you. Pavel Dovgalyuk
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.