02.10.2017 18:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 09:39 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
>> The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
>>
>> 01: was previously sent in other my series, but here is more correct
>> version, one mistake is fixed.
>> 02: only rebased to new byte-based interfaces (by Eric), r-bs saved
> Presumably, that means we need to tell patchew:
>
> Based-on:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg06848.html
> [PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based
Yes, surely, I forgot to note it.
>
>> 03: changed to use hbitmap_next_zero, also a comment added to
>> none-mode (Fam)
>> 04: commit message rewritten. The patch was controversial, but I need
>> it for further backup enhancement, so, let's continue the
>> discussion.
>> 05: rebased, logic is not changed, r-bs saved
>>
>>
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5):
>> hbitmap: add next_zero function
>> backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap
>> backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental
>> backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing
>> backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup
>>
>> include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 +
>> include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 8 +++
>> block/backup.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 5 ++
>> util/hbitmap.c | 29 +++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir