On 19 April 2018 at 08:27, Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com>
wrote:
> SNOOP_NONE state handle is moved above in the if ladder, as it's same
> as SNOOP_STRIPPING during data cycles.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <saipava@xilinx.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes for V2:
> Fixed commit message
> Reordered to code, to avoid code duplication.
> Changes for V3:
> Dropped the cover letter, as its a minor fix now
> Fixed commit message by explaining only what's fixed
> removed the dummy_byte decrement changes
>
> hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c b/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> index 426f971..03f5fae 100644
> --- a/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> +++ b/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ static void xilinx_spips_flush_txfifo(XilinxSPIPS *s)
> if (fifo8_is_empty(&s->tx_fifo)) {
> xilinx_spips_update_ixr(s);
> return;
> - } else if (s->snoop_state == SNOOP_STRIPING) {
> + } else if (s->snoop_state == SNOOP_STRIPING ||
> + s->snoop_state == SNOOP_NONE) {
> for (i = 0; i < num_effective_busses(s); ++i) {
> tx_rx[i] = fifo8_pop(&s->tx_fifo);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>