[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/1] xilinx_spips dummy bytes fix

Sai Pavan Boddu posted 1 patch 6 years ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/1523974696-1965-1-git-send-email-saipava@xilinx.com
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-build@min-glib passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test s390x passed
There is a newer version of this series
hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/1] xilinx_spips dummy bytes fix
Posted by Sai Pavan Boddu 6 years ago
For zynq-7000 boards, we saw issues when u-boot/linux accessing the qspi.
Issue is due to wrong dummy byte transfers for few of un-handled commands ex: 0x9F, 0x6, 0xe9, 0x4, 0x18, etc
There are many unhandled commands which do not require dummy bytes but they can be followed by address cycles.

To fix this issue for above commands, the next upcoming tx bytes are not considered dummies rather sent to slave directly.

Sai Pavan Boddu (1):
  xilinx_spips: send dummy only if cmd requires it

 hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/1] xilinx_spips dummy bytes fix
Posted by Alistair Francis 6 years ago
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Sai Pavan Boddu
<sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com> wrote:
> For zynq-7000 boards, we saw issues when u-boot/linux accessing the qspi.
> Issue is due to wrong dummy byte transfers for few of un-handled commands ex: 0x9F, 0x6, 0xe9, 0x4, 0x18, etc
> There are many unhandled commands which do not require dummy bytes but they can be followed by address cycles.
>
> To fix this issue for above commands, the next upcoming tx bytes are not considered dummies rather sent to slave directly.
>
> Sai Pavan Boddu (1):
>   xilinx_spips: send dummy only if cmd requires it

I don't see this patch on the list, I only see the cover letter.

Do other see it?

Alistair

>
>  hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/1] xilinx_spips dummy bytes fix
Posted by Alistair Francis 6 years ago
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Sai Pavan Boddu
> <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com> wrote:
>> For zynq-7000 boards, we saw issues when u-boot/linux accessing the qspi.
>> Issue is due to wrong dummy byte transfers for few of un-handled commands ex: 0x9F, 0x6, 0xe9, 0x4, 0x18, etc
>> There are many unhandled commands which do not require dummy bytes but they can be followed by address cycles.
>>
>> To fix this issue for above commands, the next upcoming tx bytes are not considered dummies rather sent to slave directly.
>>
>> Sai Pavan Boddu (1):
>>   xilinx_spips: send dummy only if cmd requires it
>
> I don't see this patch on the list, I only see the cover letter.
>
> Do other see it?

Never mind, it just came through.

Alistair

>
> Alistair
>
>>
>>  hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>