The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller
than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely
superfluous here.
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c
index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644
--- a/hw/block/onenand.c
+++ b/hw/block/onenand.c
@@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s)
s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT;
for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) {
- if (b >= s->blocks) {
- s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD;
- break;
- }
if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN)
break;
--
1.8.3.1
On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote: > The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller > than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely > superfluous here. > > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c > index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644 > --- a/hw/block/onenand.c > +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c > @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s) > s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT; > > for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) { > - if (b >= s->blocks) { > - s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD; > - break; > - } > if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN) > break; > > Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23. Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Am 03.10.2017 um 12:25 hat Laurent Vivier geschrieben: > On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote: > > The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller > > than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely > > superfluous here. > > > > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007 > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > > --- > > hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ---- > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c > > index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644 > > --- a/hw/block/onenand.c > > +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c > > @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s) > > s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT; > > > > for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) { > > - if (b >= s->blocks) { > > - s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD; > > - break; > > - } > > if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN) > > break; > > > > > > Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23. > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.