The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller
than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely
superfluous here.
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c
index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644
--- a/hw/block/onenand.c
+++ b/hw/block/onenand.c
@@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s)
s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT;
for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) {
- if (b >= s->blocks) {
- s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD;
- break;
- }
if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN)
break;
--
1.8.3.1
On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller
> than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely
> superfluous here.
>
> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c
> index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644
> --- a/hw/block/onenand.c
> +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c
> @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s)
> s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT;
>
> for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) {
> - if (b >= s->blocks) {
> - s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD;
> - break;
> - }
> if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN)
> break;
>
>
Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Am 03.10.2017 um 12:25 hat Laurent Vivier geschrieben:
> On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller
> > than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely
> > superfluous here.
> >
> > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c
> > index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/onenand.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c
> > @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s)
> > s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT;
> >
> > for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) {
> > - if (b >= s->blocks) {
> > - s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN)
> > break;
> >
> >
>
> Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Kevin
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.