On a Monday in 2023, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>One check is there, but there ought to be more.
>
>Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033879
>
>Martin Kletzander (4):
> Fix test case to actually test something
> tests: Check error message in virnetdaemontest
> rpc: Fix error message in virNetServerSetClientLimits
> rpc: Check client limits in more places
>
> src/rpc/virnetserver.c | 19 ++++++++++--
> ...nput-data-client-auth-pending-failure.json | 4 +--
> ...nput-data-invalid-max-clients-failure.json | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../output-data-anon-clients.err | 1 +
> ...utput-data-client-auth-pending-failure.err | 1 +
> ...utput-data-invalid-max-clients-failure.err | 1 +
> tests/virnetdaemontest.c | 20 +++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/virnetdaemondata/input-data-invalid-max-clients-failure.json
> create mode 100644 tests/virnetdaemondata/output-data-anon-clients.err
> create mode 100644 tests/virnetdaemondata/output-data-client-auth-pending-failure.err
> create mode 100644 tests/virnetdaemondata/output-data-invalid-max-clients-failure.err
>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Jano