From nobody Thu May 2 12:16:46 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1510327423926729.7524316108653; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1B964090; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256DE6FDD3; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145A21800BDB; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vAAFNdwB001268 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:23:39 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id DF4C76F97B; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moe.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.192]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6621E1798D for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Michal Privoznik To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:23:27 +0100 Message-Id: <68f821555b861d4472d0a6f432f997bbd96e9315.1510327407.git.mprivozn@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH] Revert "virNetDevSupportBandwidth: Enable QoS for vhostuser" X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:23:43 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1497410 This reverts commit bc8a99ef06417a2303ccab455f9f045e2a617916. The vhostuser is not a TAP. Therefore our QoS code is not able to set any bandwidth. I don't really understand what I was thinking. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.h b/src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_c= onf.h index c37828065..30f988953 100644 --- a/src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.h +++ b/src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.h @@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ static inline bool virNetDevSupportBandwidth(virDomainNet= Type type) case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_NETWORK: case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_DIRECT: case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_ETHERNET: - case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_VHOSTUSER: return true; case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_USER: + case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_VHOSTUSER: case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_SERVER: case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_CLIENT: case VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_MCAST: --=20 2.13.6 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list