From nobody Thu May 2 22:57:59 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1528961524514370.9228781998544; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EDAD68D3; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232131084046; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74011800534; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w5E7VvT3001541 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 03:31:57 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E70782144B4F; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from antique-work.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.152]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9312144B4E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:31:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Pavel Hrdina To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:31:55 +0200 Message-Id: <650d7eda3fbf185cecabdbfd6d3d196927587ad3.1528960954.git.phrdina@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH] virtportallocator: Change number of ports to 65536 X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:32:03 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" USHRT_MAX is not good enough because the value is 65535 which specifies the number of bits in bitmap. The allowed port range is 0-65535 so we need to increase the number. We could have USHRT_MAX + 1 but let's define the number explicitly. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1590214 Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina Reviewed-by: J=EF=BF=BDn Tomko --- src/util/virportallocator.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c index 004a2dab81..db95a601c7 100644 --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ =20 #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE =20 +#define VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_NUM_PORTS 65536 + typedef struct _virPortAllocator virPortAllocator; typedef virPortAllocator *virPortAllocatorPtr; struct _virPortAllocator { @@ -68,7 +70,7 @@ virPortAllocatorNew(void) if (!(pa =3D virObjectLockableNew(virPortAllocatorClass))) return NULL; =20 - if (!(pa->bitmap =3D virBitmapNew(USHRT_MAX))) + if (!(pa->bitmap =3D virBitmapNew(VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_NUM_PORTS))) goto error; =20 return pa; --=20 2.17.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list