The virNodeDeviceGetPCIVPDDynamicCap() function is called from
virNodeDeviceGetPCIDynamicCaps() and therefore has to be a wee
bit more clever about adding VPD capability. Namely, it has to
remove the old one before adding a new one. This is how other
functions called from virNodeDeviceGetPCIDynamicCaps() behave
as well.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143235
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
---
src/conf/node_device_conf.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/conf/node_device_conf.c b/src/conf/node_device_conf.c
index 83e66b85e3..af331baaf3 100644
--- a/src/conf/node_device_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/node_device_conf.c
@@ -3068,6 +3068,9 @@ virNodeDeviceGetPCIVPDDynamicCap(virNodeDevCapPCIDev *devCapPCIDev)
virPCIDeviceAddress devAddr = { 0 };
g_autoptr(virPCIVPDResource) res = NULL;
+ g_clear_pointer(&devCapPCIDev->vpd, virPCIVPDResourceFree);
+ devCapPCIDev->flags &= ~VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_PCI_VPD;
+
devAddr.domain = devCapPCIDev->domain;
devAddr.bus = devCapPCIDev->bus;
devAddr.slot = devCapPCIDev->slot;
@@ -3081,8 +3084,6 @@ virNodeDeviceGetPCIVPDDynamicCap(virNodeDevCapPCIDev *devCapPCIDev)
if ((res = virPCIDeviceGetVPD(pciDev))) {
devCapPCIDev->flags |= VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_PCI_VPD;
devCapPCIDev->vpd = g_steal_pointer(&res);
- } else {
- virPCIVPDResourceFree(g_steal_pointer(&devCapPCIDev->vpd));
}
}
return 0;
--
2.37.4