ping?
Beyond patch 1 which was reviewed. These are not uml specific, but
rather more how domain objects are handled
Tks -
John
On 04/02/2018 09:06 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Patches 9-11 of larger series:
> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00489.html
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> * Patches 1 and 2 new - essentially they fix issues with how
> virDomainObjListRemove was used inconsistently.
>
> * Patch 3 should be the same or very similar to the former patch 9:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00498.html
>
> * Patch 4 should be the same as former patch 10:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00499.html
>
> * Patch 5 is altered to also fix virDomainObjListRemove inconsistencies
>
> John Ferlan (5):
> uml: Fix umlProcessAutoDestroyDom dom processing
> uml: Fix umlInotifyEvent dom object handling
> uml: Create accessors to virDomainObjListFindByUUID
> uml: Add more specific error message on failed FindBy call
> uml: Use virDomainObjListFindBy{UUID|ID}Ref
>
> src/uml/uml_driver.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list