On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:16:13PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
>On 08/13/2017 11:44 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> John found these two problems with Coverity after I pushed my series
>> fixing MAC address saving/setting on Mellanox dual port NICs.
>>
>> Laine Stump (2):
>> util: fix Coverity complaint (and actual bug) in
>> virHostdevReadNetConfig()
>> util: fix Coverity complaint in virNetDevSetNetConfig()
>>
>> src/util/virhostdev.c | 2 +-
>> src/util/virnetdev.c | 4 +---
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
>"Some" will say no need to call out Coverity in the short description,
>just somewhere in the commit message a "found by coverity" is
>sufficient. And then there's others that are fine with it as is, your
>call ;-)
Yes, 'fix Coverity complaint (and actual bug)' carries pretty much the
same information as 'fix' while wasting way more precious commit summary
characters.
Jan
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list