From nobody Thu May 2 05:12:25 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.24 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.24; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx3-phx2.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; Return-Path: Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (mx3-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.24]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1486403623907830.6478879975919; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:53:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v16HnWFd010237; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:49:33 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v16HnVd7028924 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:49:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v16HnVkW001454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:49:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com (mail-lf0-f65.google.com [209.85.215.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84FB80F8F for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id x1so4584341lff.0 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from kloomba.my.domain ([95.104.139.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 33sm476816lfs.43.2017.02.06.09.49.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:49:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=y3t/mMBNy+efL3FcAD01/hLQDvpyn9Cng9Wjpg3lf5M=; b=jCGFV3WGtqVooqbZn4YeLJhpvyrOEuRvmgEA26LzUbvhCWK8Y0rSkl0zWP92UR2cij WGLQU2Q/GxVDVEwU7q3F+TTs6cILtR7ELQW0L+xWH3NqwYHA+UICFNfueT2T3eW2fLUU poj2AXK65QcVm5hmxPAskUTJes4xNMVJYkrtt46b785nZYDJYekkZbMcUAEey3Wyykym X84k/+b8ixjx3qthkUu7L/j5AWRqg/2as/mcxXzqU+emruhT/31ta6X2YQfcg3MyF//n 3j2CfzEEqMu0ZnI6BMfAFx3rHi6o0oiMHS4nOUeKwPxE98GOPaMjqejY01tEEV+URtU1 aUJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=y3t/mMBNy+efL3FcAD01/hLQDvpyn9Cng9Wjpg3lf5M=; b=CqhMkAPaV21cmACyL3G6erimzzD96WjG443ddKTmXnf5Ex5NzmxljF7pqIAg2hlUMr Kz+DcUJ0JvQ0+04CEHYPW9Ec6nFJ0BRodZaoyRKhR+erNnC7kajnLODr/fvnomedVs+c 0cYBtapTkJaS00DKEz4Y7cP8Pt+QhrEop1j6AVoHkJ3Xb3xJhGnysy2XSZ9zJNl3GgTB dMjYkiVEOa2Qdk17zNCntg4JKRwNKhtW7OM13RRNuf6N7cGNorVTbpNbyZ64//+bEtQ5 kAIlGX7grhqUT0+QjM3KhN1sYlVi79NexVD+0HkchakzReQFn9HxX4sxS27Hg6jBbwfm cB2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKWdyGUURSEWNu+3jP+qD6UzuJSdCjyzzaKdaaMUybFKzQlbPM8hNDDBNfZhjwoIg== X-Received: by 10.25.215.103 with SMTP id o100mr4033656lfg.126.1486403367896; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:49:27 -0800 (PST) From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:49:19 +0400 Message-Id: <20170206174919.8940-1-bogorodskiy@gmail.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.215.65' DOMAIN:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' HELO:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' FROM:'bogorodskiy@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 1.17 * (BAYES_50, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, SPF_PASS) 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.27 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Cc: Roman Bogorodskiy Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] docs: mention bhyve SATA address changes in news.xml X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" --- docs/news.xml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml index f408293a1..7990cc6d4 100644 --- a/docs/news.xml +++ b/docs/news.xml @@ -56,6 +56,25 @@ a fabric name has been removed by making it optional. + + + bhyve: change address allocation schema for SATA disks + + + Previously, the bhyve driver assigned PCI addresses to SATA disks + directly rather than assigning that to a controller and + using SATA addresses for disks. It was implemented this way + because bhyve has no notion of an explicit SATA controller. + However, as this doesn't match libvirt's understanding of + disk addresses, it was changed for the bhyve driver + to follow the common schema and have PCI addresses + for SATA controllers and SATA addresses for disks. If you're + having issues because of this, it's recommended to edit + the domain's XML and remove <address type=3D'pci'> + from the <disk> elements with <target bus=3D'sata'/> + and let libvirt regenerate it properly. + + --=20 2.11.0 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list