[libvirt] [PATCH] test: adding tests to virStrToDouble() inside virstringtest.

Julio Faracco posted 1 patch 6 years, 8 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/libvirt tags/patchew/1499641477-25001-1-git-send-email-jcfaracco@gmail.com
There is a newer version of this series
tests/virstringtest.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
[libvirt] [PATCH] test: adding tests to virStrToDouble() inside virstringtest.
Posted by Julio Faracco 6 years, 8 months ago
There are no occurrences of tests related to Strings and Double numbers
inside virstringtest.c. This commit introduces some tests to validate the
conversion. The test does not include locale changes yet.

Signed-off-by: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>
---
 tests/virstringtest.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/virstringtest.c b/tests/virstringtest.c
index 97c6e76..cc95d3c 100644
--- a/tests/virstringtest.c
+++ b/tests/virstringtest.c
@@ -652,6 +652,48 @@ testStringToLong(const void *opaque)
 }
 
 
+struct stringToDoubleData {
+    const char *str;
+    const char *end_ptr;
+    double res;
+};
+
+/* This test checks if double strings are successfully converted to double
+ * number considering the byproduct string too. */
+static int
+testStringToDouble(const void *opaque)
+{
+    const struct stringToDoubleData *data = opaque;
+    int ret = -1;
+    char *end_ptr = NULL;
+    double res = 0;
+
+    /* end_ptr returns or a substring or an empty string.
+     * It never returns a NULL pointer. */
+    if ((ret = virStrToDouble(data->str,
+                              data->end_ptr ? &end_ptr : NULL,
+                              &res)) < 0) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Convert error of '%s', expected '%lf'\n",
+                data->str, data->res);
+        return ret;
+    }
+
+    if (res != data->res) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Returned '%lf', expected '%lf'\n",
+                res, data->res);
+        return -1;
+    }
+
+    /* Comparing substrings. */
+    if (STRNEQ_NULLABLE(end_ptr, data->end_ptr)) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Expected substring '%s', but got '%s'\n",
+                end_ptr, data->end_ptr);
+        return -1;
+    }
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
 /* The point of this test is to check whether all members of the array are
  * freed. The test has to be checked using valgrind. */
 static int
@@ -965,6 +1007,44 @@ mymain(void)
     TEST_STRTOL("-18446744073709551616", NULL, 0, -1, 0U, -1,
                 0LL, -1, 0ULL, -1);
 
+#define TEST_STRTOD(str, end_ptr, res)                                  \
+    do {                                                                \
+        struct stringToDoubleData data = {                              \
+            str, end_ptr, res,                                          \
+        };                                                              \
+        if (virTestRun("virStringToDouble '" str "'",                   \
+                       testStringToDouble, &data) < 0)                  \
+            ret = -1;                                                   \
+    } while (0)
+
+    /* Simple numbers. */
+    TEST_STRTOD("0.0", NULL, 0);
+    TEST_STRTOD("1.0", NULL, 1);
+    TEST_STRTOD("3.14159", NULL, 3.14159);
+    TEST_STRTOD("0.57721", NULL, 0.57721);
+
+    /* Testing ending string. */
+    TEST_STRTOD("2.718", "", 2.718);
+    TEST_STRTOD("2.718 281 828 459", " 281 828 459", 2.718);
+    TEST_STRTOD("2.718,281,828,459", ",281,828,459", 2.718);
+
+    /* Scientific numbers. */
+    TEST_STRTOD("3.14159e+000", NULL, 3.14159);
+    TEST_STRTOD("2.00600e+003", NULL, 2006);
+    TEST_STRTOD("1.00000e-010", NULL, 1e-010);
+
+    /* Negative numbers. */
+    TEST_STRTOD("-1.6180339887", NULL, -1.6180339887);
+    TEST_STRTOD("-0.00031e-010", NULL, -0.00031e-010);
+
+    /* Long numbers. */
+    TEST_STRTOD("57089907708238388904078437636832797971793838081897.0",
+                NULL,
+                57089907708238388904078437636832797971793838081897.0);
+    TEST_STRTOD("3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105",
+                NULL,
+                3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105);
+
     /* test virStringListFreeCount */
     if (virTestRun("virStringListFreeCount", testVirStringListFreeCount,
                    NULL) < 0)
-- 
2.7.4

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] test: adding tests to virStrToDouble() inside virstringtest.
Posted by Peter Krempa 6 years, 8 months ago
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 20:04:37 -0300, Julio Faracco wrote:
> There are no occurrences of tests related to Strings and Double numbers
> inside virstringtest.c. This commit introduces some tests to validate the
> conversion. The test does not include locale changes yet.

Testing with changed locale will require some code that will make sure
that it's not invoked if the given locale is not installed on the
system.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/virstringtest.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

ACK to the patch I'll push it in a while.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list