Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
---
docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
--- a/docs/news.xml
+++ b/docs/news.xml
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
was <code>virtio-net</code>.
</description>
</change>
+ <change>
+ <summary>
+ libxl: add tunnelled migration support
+ </summary>
+ <description>
+ Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of
+ strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection
+ other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
+ </description>
+ </change>
</section>
<section title="Improvements">
<change>
--
2.1.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Joao Martins wrote: > Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> > --- > docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml > index b756a97..b0629b5 100644 > --- a/docs/news.xml > +++ b/docs/news.xml > @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ > was <code>virtio-net</code>. > </description> > </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + libxl: add tunnelled migration support > + </summary> > + <description> > + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of > + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection > + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd. > + </description> > + </change> > </section> > <section title="Improvements"> > <change> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Joao Martins wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> >> --- >> docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml >> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644 >> --- a/docs/news.xml >> +++ b/docs/news.xml >> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ >> was <code>virtio-net</code>. >> </description> >> </change> >> + <change> >> + <summary> >> + libxl: add tunnelled migration support >> + </summary> >> + <description> >> + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of >> + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection >> + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd. >> + </description> >> + </change> >> </section> >> <section title="Improvements"> >> <change> > > Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating > the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup. Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you will find a *lot* of matches: $ git grep tunneled | wc -l 10 $ git grep tunnelled | wc -l 1242 Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled being both correct. Joao -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote: > On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> Joao Martins wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> >>> --- >>> docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml >>> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644 >>> --- a/docs/news.xml >>> +++ b/docs/news.xml >>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ >>> was <code>virtio-net</code>. >>> </description> >>> </change> >>> + <change> >>> + <summary> >>> + libxl: add tunnelled migration support >>> + </summary> >>> + <description> >>> + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of >>> + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection >>> + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd. >>> + </description> >>> + </change> >>> </section> >>> <section title="Improvements"> >>> <change> >> >> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating >> the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup. > > Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you > will find a *lot* of matches: > > $ git grep tunneled | wc -l > 10 > $ git grep tunnelled | wc -l > 1242 So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-) > Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled > being both correct. Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com> wrote: > > Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem > to recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks > prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit. > > I think you have me to blame for "tunnelled". At the time I initially wrote tunnelled migration support, I did a Google search similar to what you have done, and determined that tunnelled seemed to be slightly preferred. Subsequently almost everyone has balked at it, but I think the horse has left the barn on it and we should probably stick with "tunnelled". Chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 02/15/2017 06:35 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com > <mailto:jfehlig@suse.com>> wrote: > > > Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to > recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks > prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit. > > > I think you have me to blame for "tunnelled". At the time I initially wrote > tunnelled migration support, I did a Google search similar to what you have > done, and determined that tunnelled seemed to be slightly preferred. > Subsequently almost everyone has balked at it, but I think the horse has left > the barn on it and we should probably stick with "tunnelled". Ok. I also failed to realize that the commit providing the news item used 'tunnelled'. I've sent a patch to revert the spelling change, but I'll wait for an explicit ACK this time https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-February/msg00770.html Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 02/16/2017 01:24 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote: >> On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Joao Martins wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> >>>> --- >>>> docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml >>>> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644 >>>> --- a/docs/news.xml >>>> +++ b/docs/news.xml >>>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ >>>> was <code>virtio-net</code>. >>>> </description> >>>> </change> >>>> + <change> >>>> + <summary> >>>> + libxl: add tunnelled migration support >>>> + </summary> >>>> + <description> >>>> + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of >>>> + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection >>>> + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd. >>>> + </description> >>>> + </change> >>>> </section> >>>> <section title="Improvements"> >>>> <change> >>> >>> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating >>> the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup. >> >> Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you >> will find a *lot* of matches: >> >> $ git grep tunneled | wc -l >> 10 >> $ git grep tunnelled | wc -l >> 1242 > > So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-) Hehe :D >> Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled >> being both correct. > > Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to > recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I > can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit. Sorry I may have mis-expressed myself before - didn't meant this being an issue. I was just curious about the word because I made that same mistake throughout the patches. Probably there's no need for revert with both appearing correct (as folks are suggesting in followup messages) Joao -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.